Friday, January 06, 2006

Our Bloodied Hands: Trying to Hide

Written quickly, uneditted, unsmoothed, raw emotion, raw life.

So, I am just going to outright say what I believe without fear of future damnation by the more "enlightened" members of this fetid wound of a society. I was just watching CBC and another example of the corelations between the Eugenics movement and the Abortion rhetoric of today. In the 19th and 20th century supporting positive and negative Eugenics was status quo, which culminated in the massacre of Jews and many other groups by the National Socialists in Germany. I will give a brief synopsis of what Eugenics is.

The word comes from the Greek Eu meaning good and genus meaning birth or origin. So, through the 19th and 20th century people were strictly regulated by their birth place. The main support for Eugenics was in fact in the US and Canada, but was later adopted by Hitler to whipe out mass amounts of people. Eugenics in the US and Canada led to the segregation of the poor, drunken, "feebleminded", Irish, female (although many feminists of note were Eugenicists as well), etc etc. People with "good pedigree" were encouraged to breed together so that people with "bad traits" like being left handed were bred out of the human race. Mentally handicapped people were sterilized and locked in institutions to ensure that the gene pool was not "tainted". Oh by the way, Tommy Douglas , voted Greatest Canadian wrote his masters thesis on the wonders of Eugenics and sterilization. After Hitler sullied the good name of Eugenics it went underground.

I believe that the new word for Eugenics is Abortion and some cases of Euthenasia. I believe all of these things are merely Euphemisms, see that Eu again, for systematic discrimiination, torture and murder. I have drawn the different correlations between the arguments supporting Eugenics and Abortion in previous papers that have been submitted to my professors at UBC, so I will not spend time elaborating on them save this. As with Eugenics, in which the voice of the state supersedes that of the individual, so in Abortion is the voice of the foetus superseded by voices of society and the parents.

I shall now refocus on my latest outrage which I found on CBC. The CBC endorced the book of an economist who made barbaric claims. He claimed that crime rate has gone down because of abortions. He claimed that because most people who have abortions are in a "lower class" our acceptance of abortion has effectively "nipped the problem" of crime caused by poverty by killing the criminals before they were born. Not only is this the same as the class and racial profiling that Eugenics brings about, but it is also as chilling as the speculation about convicting someone based on forseeing the future as in the Tom Cruise movie, the title eludes me at the moment.

Instead of looking at the future with bogus telepathic abilities, but through family circumstances and genetics. Think of the attrocities that will spring from this enlightened conclusion. If we can just abort those whom we think will become criminals then why don't we just massacre every person who commits any crime becasue they obviously have the crime gene in them. Or, maybe we should just anihiliate poor people. Or, oh oh, oh wait, I am starting to sound like Adolf Hitler now, oh oh wait, abortion and eugenics follow the same reasoning that led to the Holocaust.

I believe in life ladies and gentlemen. I will not raise my hand in violence against any man, woman or child. I have said this and people have asked me whether I would not defend myself or the people I love. To that I was forced to agree, so I do suppose I would defend myself. But, if foetuses are being murdered and other groups are coming up on the chopping block should I not also defend them. Should I not take up arms again this sea of oppression. Oh, the day is coming, when I will put down my pen, stop the arguing and just defend the lives of all the people on this earth. I believe in LIFE, let LIFE be, let it run its course, let the eelderly die in peace without pumping them full of drugs, feeding tubes and ventilators. Let pregnancies come to term, and let those with mental and physical disabilities live as they are. Let them LIVE in LOVE. LOVE!

But how can my words do anything, I am just a crack pot pro-lifer. I say to those who disagree with me, one day the knock will come to your door and you will be told that you are "not fit" to live. I encourage you my reader to read up on the history of Eugenics.

I end with one more comment. If I am wrong I am an immense fool and very stupid, but if those who support abortion and chose death over life, if YOU, if YOU are WRONG then you have the blood of millions on your hands.

Do you have blood on your hands?

We've all got blood on our hands...

God help us...

4 comments:

the philosopher one said...

don't even try to fucking joke about this one pretty one

Anonymous said...

You'll just encourage it. That's right, IT!
UNPERSON, UNPERSON!
John is unfit to live.
Seriously though, well written, clear; we may have pig foetuses thrown at our homes, but oh well.

Anonymous said...

What an unconvincing argument you present. This economist found a correlation between abortions and the crime rate. He made no moral commentary on the topic. Are you upset that there is a correlation? Or, if you do not believ that there is a correlation present something on the matter. This is just drivel.

Erroneous Monk said...

I'll do what I please and say what I want, philo. Thank you one legged man!